Review



erf3 as anti gfp clonetech  (TaKaRa)


Bioz Verified Symbol TaKaRa is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol TaKaRa manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    TaKaRa erf3 as anti gfp clonetech
    Erf3 As Anti Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 408 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pm31597105-369-136-138?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 408 article reviews
    erf3 as anti gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    TaKaRa erf3 as anti gfp clonetech
    Erf3 As Anti Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pm31597105-369-136-138?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    erf3 as anti gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Euromedex euromedex erf3 as anti gfp clonetech
    Euromedex Erf3 As Anti Gfp Clonetech, supplied by Euromedex, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pm31597105-369-135-135?v=Euromedex
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    euromedex erf3 as anti gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa euromedex erf3 as anti gfp clonetech
    Euromedex Erf3 As Anti Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pm31597105-369-135-138?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    euromedex erf3 as anti gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa antibody rabbit plcl anti gfp clonetech
    Antibody Rabbit Plcl Anti Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/10__7554_slash_elife__47209-281-200-204?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody rabbit plcl anti gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa antibody mouse mcl anti gfp clonetech
    Antibody Mouse Mcl Anti Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/10__7554_slash_elife__47209-281-191-195?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody mouse mcl anti gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa gfp clonetech
    Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from <t>GUN1-GFP</t> transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.
    Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pm31061535-541-8-9?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    TaKaRa recombinant dna reagent akap lbc gfp clonetech
    Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from <t>GUN1-GFP</t> transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.
    Recombinant Dna Reagent Akap Lbc Gfp Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/10__7554_slash_elife__44187-259-68-73?v=TaKaRa
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant dna reagent akap lbc gfp clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    TaKaRa gfp 1020 rrid ab 10000240 dsred rabbit clonetech
    Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from <t>GUN1-GFP</t> transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.
    Gfp 1020 Rrid Ab 10000240 Dsred Rabbit Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pmc05920726__NIHMS945380___supplement___2-3-52-56?v=TaKaRa
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gfp 1020 rrid ab 10000240 dsred rabbit clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    Addgene inc y115f 5ht3hc ires gfp addgene 32477 pcavde3sce kremer lab n a pcmv egfp 2a psam ha geneart ag n a cell lines lenti x293t cells clonetech
    Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from <t>GUN1-GFP</t> transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.
    Y115f 5ht3hc Ires Gfp Addgene 32477 Pcavde3sce Kremer Lab N A Pcmv Egfp 2a Psam Ha Geneart Ag N A Cell Lines Lenti X293t Cells Clonetech, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/10__7554_slash_elife__29808-202-49-51?v=Addgene+inc
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    y115f 5ht3hc ires gfp addgene 32477 pcavde3sce kremer lab n a pcmv egfp 2a psam ha geneart ag n a cell lines lenti x293t cells clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    TaKaRa 632592 clonetech
    Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from <t>GUN1-GFP</t> transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting <t>with</t> <t>anti-GFP</t> antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.
    632592 Clonetech, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gfp+clonetech/pmc04351826-213-20-21?v=TaKaRa
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    632592 clonetech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from GUN1-GFP transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed with anti-GFP antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting with anti-GFP antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.

    Journal: Nature plants

    Article Title: Control of retrograde signalling by protein import and cytosolic folding stress.

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0415-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 | GUN1 physically interacts with the ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1 chaperones. a, Co-IPs performed with rosette leaves from GUN1-GFP transgenic lines in the gun1-101 (C-1) or wild-type (OE-13) background. An RBCS transit peptide-fused GFP in the wild-type background (C-cpGFP) line was used as a co-IP control. Tic40, which cannot be detected by mass spectrometry in co-IPs, was included as a negative control. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane and analysed as input control. Four independent immunoprecipitation experiments were performed with anti-GFP antibodies, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to western blotting with anti-GFP antibodies (detecting cpGFP and GUN1-GFP) or antibodies against proteins associated with the Tic (anti-ClpC, anti-Tic110 and anti-Tic40) and Toc (anti-Toc159) complexes. b, Co-IP performed with de-etiolating seedlings grown without (control) or with 0.5 mM Lin. Of the total input, 10% was loaded in a separated lane as input control. Two independent co-IP experiments were performed and showed similar results. The anti-ClpC and anti-cpHSC70 antibodies (in a and b) do not distinguish between different isoforms of ClpC (ClpC1 and ClpC2) and cpHSC70 (cpHSC70-1 and cpHSC70-2), respectively. c, BiFC assays verifying the specific interaction of GUN1 with ClpC1 and cpHSC70-1. GUN1-YN co-expressed with ClpD-YC served as the negative control. ClpC1-YN co-expressed with Tic110-YC served as the positive control. For additional controls expressing the individual proteins as GFP fusions, see Supplementary Fig. 6. Three independent experiments were performed and showed similar results. Scale bars, 10 µm. d, The cphsc70-1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype. Expression of LHCB1.2 was determined by qRT–PCR and the relative gene expression is compared to that in the wild type (WT) grown under identical conditions. Data are presented as means ± s.d. (n = 3 biologically independent samples, indicated as open circles). In contrast to cphsc70-1, the clpc1 mutant shows a GUN phenotype only upon Lin (0.5 mM) treatment, but not upon NF (5 µM) treatment. See Supplementary Fig. 9a for expression data for additional PhANG genes and non-PhANG control genes.

    Article Snippet: All other antibodies were obtained from commercial suppliers: GFP: Clonetech (632381, clone name: JL-8, dilution: 1:5000).

    Techniques: Transgenic Assay, Co-Immunoprecipitation Assay, Control, Mass Spectrometry, Negative Control, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Positive Control, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression